Agreement of People website

Sign here if you support the campaign for a real democracy

Our blogs


AWTW FacebookAWTW Twitter

Your Say

Car workers abandoned by union leaders

Toyota car workers at plants around the country yesterday voted by more than two to one to accept a 10% cut in pay and hours, which was recommended to them by UNITE and GMB unions on the spurious grounds that the negotiated “deal” was better than redundancy.

Peter Tsouvallaris, the UNITE representative at Toyota, argued that the deal would mean that workers would not suffer the fate of the 1,000 workers at Jaguar Land Rover (JLR), 850 at Mini and 1,200 at Nissan who have their jobs cut recently. But taking a pay cut won’t save Toyota. Predictions are that the company will face an operating loss of £3.4 billion by the end of March due to sharp falls in global sales. Sales of new cars in February in Britain were 22% lower than a year earlier.

And while the unions betray their members by peddling hours and pay cuts as the lesser of two evils, 1,000 jobs are disappearing each week in the Birmingham area alone in companies supplying the major manufacturers. And union leaders are doing nothing about it.

Other car manufacturers are in the same position as Toyota. General Motors introduced a three-year wage freeze for Canadian workers earlier this month. GM Europe, Vauxhall’s parent company last week warned that it was about to go bankrupt. GM spokesman said that "everything will fall over" if support for the company was not forthcoming. This includes plants at Ellesmere Port and Luton, which employ 4,000 people. GM is seeking huge bail-outs from European governments as a price for keeping plants open.

Is there any help forthcoming from the Trades Union Congress about how to cope with the threat of the sack? Well, actually no. In two booklets, called Coping with the Downturn and Facing Redundancy, pains are taken to explain the difference between the “sack” and “redundancy”, claiming that “redundancy is a fair reason for dismissal”.

Clearly the TUC believes that unemployment is inevitable and that people must accept the “fate” that capitalism is dishing out to them. It sees its role as mediating between workers, their employers and the government to convince workers that there is no alternative and that they must accept the pain and find ways to live in poverty.

The stark fact is that no amount of pay freezing and shorter hours will resolve the massive over-capacity that has built up in the industry over past decades, not to speak of the ongoing collapse of the global capitalist economy. As to the claim by union bureaucrats that their “solution” is the lesser of two evils, well, as someone once said, the lesser of two evils is still an evil.

Instead of accepting the demands of the global corporations, there has to be an organised resistance to the economic slump. It’s not going to come from UNITE and GMB leaders, who have run up the white flag, nor TUC bureaucrats. If Toyota and other corporations are going bust, it is because the economic system they are part of has fallen off a cliff.

The real way forward is for global car business to be run on an entirely different, not-for-profit way in a re-shaped transport industry. In any case, what is the point of the vast over-capacity in the motor industry, which churns out unneeded metal boxes while carbon-induced climate change takes the planet to hell on wheels?

It’s time for the biggest industrial and social change ever. Toyota and GM workers could be making really useful, ecologically-sound forms of transport. The first step towards that goal is an occupation of threatened plants and an ousting of the executives whose failed policies have brought the company to its knees and the removal of union officials who have absolutely no intention of leading a fight back.

Corinna Lotz
AWTW secretary
12 March 2009

Bruce says:

Normally a negotiated deal is better than redundancy?!, What the hell does this mean,? Yes! its true if you are the winner, is this not the rehashed left over's from the old (new) Labour gradualists table, (as they give away what's not their's) these lions, sorry! rats haven't changed from the great miners strike of 94-1995,"The miners' strike: unfinished business", and their betrayal of it.

"Negotiated" this implies that those negotiating have our interests insight rather than giving away hard won rights to capitalism (Toyota), but is there another way, one that looks after the interests of the unions members as against that of the interests of the bosses with out giving away wages (which is all workers get from this rotten system) for example the Peoples Charter for change, or and the AWTW, Peoples Charter for Democracy, "Together, the two Charters can be used to mobilise working people to transform society and government and answer the crisis of capitalism in a positive fashion. In doing that we can reconnect with the great Chartist movement of the 19th century, which was the first in Britain to organise workers with the aim of securing political and social change", See AWTW Peoples Charter launched, article

Also negotiation are best done from a position of strength, not hello, how are you and what do you want. So where does the strength lay for the working class, our LABOUR and our ability to use it, or not, to sell this short is to give up the ghost not the holy one but that of our forefathers that fought for, the rights that the bankrupt so called union leadership give away so easily.

Comments now closed

Your name

Your E-mail (we will not publish your E-mail)