Agreement of People website

Sign here if you support the campaign for a real democracy

Our blogs


AWTW FacebookAWTW Twitter

Your Say



Colonialism is alive and well

Today’s international conference in London “on the future of Libya” has an unmistakeable colonial ring about it. Put plainly, Britain, France and America are openly plotting the destiny of someone else’s country, which is in the midst of a civil war.

Two things: nothing gives them the right to do this and, as per usual, the objectives are shrouded in a tissue of downright lies from Cameron, Obama and other Western leaders. While the stated aim is not regime change in Libya, in practice that is what is occurring before our very eyes.

A reluctance to believe anything that the Cameron-Clegg government says is clearly a factor in a new poll showing that seven out of ten people are concerned that the action in Libya could result in Britain being "dragged into a prolonged conflict like the Iraq war". By a margin of 47% to 43%, people do not believe the government was right to commit British forces to action in Libya.

Western planes are effectively bombing the opposition into power in Tripoli. Under the cover of a dubious UN resolution, they have openly flouted and exceeded the Security Council’s remit of protecting civilians from government forces and rendering humanitarian assistance through a no-fly zone.

For example, over the weekend RAF Tornados hit 22 tanks, armoured vehicles and artillery pieces which were stationary targets. In the early hours of Monday, they struck ammunition bunkers near Subha in southern Libya, where there is no conflict. These and other attacks have enabled forces fighting Colonel Gaddafi’s regime to make substantial progress without hardly firing a shot.

The hope – and it’s no more than that – is that a less unpredictable and pro-Western regime will replace Gaddafi’s. Whether it is more democratic than the present dictatorship is besides the point. Oil and stability are what counts in the short and long term (although it did not exactly work out in Iraq where China, apparently, has picked up the oil contracts).

Another dimension is the rush to try and exert some sort of influence and control over the ongoing revolutionary process in North Africa and the Middle East. The US has sanctioned a crackdown in Bahrain with the help of Saudi forces and is promoting Ali Muhsin as a replacement leader in Yemen.

And next door to Libya, the Egyptian revolution has reached a key moment. New laws against protests and strikes, which carry heavy fines and jail terms, are being introduced with the blessing of the armed forces command under Field Marshal Mohamed Tantawi. Opposition to the law is growing from organisations like the April 6 Youth Movement.

US defence secretary Robert Gates was in Cairo at the weekend to promise continuing aid to Egypt. In return, Tantawi told Gates he had no objection to the operations in Libya against Gaddafi. Tantawi and his generals represent a counter-revolutionary force in Egypt which has clear US backing. Cries of “Down with Tantawi” are being heard for the first time since the January revolution that overthrew Mubarak. This is not what Gates and Obama want to read and military action in Libya is a shot across the bows of the Egyptian revolution too.

Whatever the solution in Libya is, it cannot be one determined by the likes of Britain, France and America. These countries have not changed their spots suddenly to become agents of humanitarian concern. Turkey has called for a ceasefire and a negotiated settlement between Gaddafi and the uprising in the east of Libya, which would facilitate a transition to a new government. That appeal is likely to be drowned out, however, as sponsored regime change continues to drive the military intervention.

Paul Feldman
Communications editor
29 March 2011

Bookmark and Share

Your Say

Zlatko says:

Despite persistent parrot-style repetition of assurances by mainstream Western media that the people are on one side of the Libyan conflict while Gaddafi with his militants represents the cruel opponent of the people’s “revolution”, it is not so straightforward.

There are many indications of a huge pro-Gaddafi sentiment among some factions of Libyan civil society.  It is hard not to imagine why. My friend from Sarajevo, I will call him Marco, went to school in Gaddafi’s Libya. Later he worked as journalist in pre-war Balkans. He witnessed the brutal destruction of his country from his London workplace.

During the Yugoslav civil war, Marco’s parents remained in Libya where they spent, willingly, most of their life. I asked Marco if he believed that there could be any genuine support for the “lonely colonel”. He answered affirmatively, explaining that in a country where a regime contributed to national prosperity it is not hard to find supporters.

However, one can argue that a totalitarian who can simply exterminate his political opponents, covering his crimes under the carpet of political necessity while preserving social order and stability, deserves to be taken down. It is a perfect opportunity for the West to export human rights.

But it doesn’t have the same aspirations in Bahrain and Yemen where the “international community’s” handling of the crisis suggests that the intervention in Libya is not about protecting civilians against brutal regimes but rather a shameless exception that has been motivated by greed and supported by political opportunism.

According to Western human rights activists, wounded protesters in Bahrain’s capital Manama have been tortured by the regime. Many protesters have died in confrontations with the totalitarian regime, which is supported by Saudi Arabia and the United States. 

It is not hard to imagine that US is trying to direct the Arab revolution, perhaps creating a pretext for a greater war against Iran. The terrible truth is that, historically, the crisis-ridden global economy, in which the war industry plays a central role, always takes the same direction. What frightens me is my déjà vu of Yugoslavia’s civil war. My pessimistic scenario is of British society being driven unstoppably to the darkest ever future of war and terror.

Comments now closed

We do not store your name or email details, but may inform you if someone responds to your comment.

If you want weekly update messages please indicate and we will store your details in a secure database which is not shared with any other organisation.

Your name

Your E-mail
(we will not publish your E-mail)

Do you want Updates?

Anti-spam validation:compare< Please enter these letters>