Agreement of People website

Sign here if you support the campaign for a real democracy

Our blogs


AWTW FacebookAWTW Twitter

Your Say



The 'R' word makes it appearance

That it is 300 years since a Speaker of the House of Commons was forced from office reflects a political crisis reverberating up from the deepest bowels of society. But a new Speaker, and new rules for the expenses system have as much chance of solving the constitutional emergency as the measures taken by governments and central banks have of fixing the global financial system.

Both the political and financial turbulence reflect seismic shifts much deeper in the class relations which are at the essence of today’s troubles. In Britain, claims for the cleaning of murky moats stir issues left unresolved by the English revolution, bringing them to the surface once more.

In the British Parliament, history found a place where the representatives of two classes could argue over the exploitation of the dispossessed third. The modern-day Liberals are the inheritors of the landowning aristocracy, and the Conservatives were established and continue to pursue the interests of capital of the specifically home-grown British variety.

At the end of the 19th century the representatives of the third class, the organised, industrialised workers, were persuaded by the Fabian Society that their interests could be pursued politically by a parliamentary party known as Labour, which would seek peaceful, gradual reforms and thus avoid the nasty Continental tradition of revolution.

Fast-forward 100 years and we find that the incessant, restless growth of capital periodically interrupted by worsening crises, has transformed national politics in every country. The period of parliamentary-based reformist politics came to an abrupt end around about 1979, marked by the fall of the Calllaghan government and the beginnings of the Thatcherite period of class war and corporate-driven globalisation.

Now, the collapse in demand for the products of transnational corporations addicted to credit-induced growth sets the agenda of every government which must attempt to find a route to stabilisation. But all routes are closed except those that destroy jobs, evict people from their homes, and wipe out their savings, forcing hundreds of millions into poverty and starvation.

Those who were persuaded that the market would provide them a better pension than the state are among the first victims. A report today by Ros Altmann, a governor at the London School of Economics, says: "Essentially the entire UK pensions system has been based on a bet that equities would always do well enough over the long-term to deliver reliably good pensions. The old idea that stock markets can always be relied on to deliver strong returns has left millions facing an impoverished old age."

This is not just a British problem. California is among the richest and is on the point of bankruptcy. Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger was last night facing a ballot defeat. Polls pointed to voter fury over the failure of the Republican governor and the Democratic-controlled legislature to balance the state's books. As Californians struggle with joblessness, home foreclosures and sharp losses in the stock market, the state has raised taxes, cut spending and borrowed to try and fix a $42-billion shortfall – and still remains more than $15 billion short of a balanced budget.

In Britain, voters aren’t going to be fobbed off with a few changes to the expenses system. Even the The Guardian, which has backed New Labour at every twist and turn, is now permitted to use the R word in its columns in an attempt to keep up with public anger which increasingly expresses itself in the use of the term revolution.

What voters are seeking is justice and retribution for the past – and access to power long denied them by a Parliamentary show that, when the curtains are drawn, is spending its time assembling a tawdry collection of crumpled receipts for dog food, pornographic movies and sticks of furniture together with fraudulent claims for mortgages on second homes. Introducing real democracy will require a social revolution that is both political and economic along the lines suggested by our People’s Charter for Democracy. Nothing less will do the trick.

Gerry Gold
Economics editor
20 May 2009

Bruce says:

This is Parliament at its most illusionary, and the art of the trick is, as all good magicians know, misdirection. Parliament, the house of commons has acted as a safety valve and its doing its job (just). The real problem is not so much the MP's, they are doing what the system was designed for and encourages them to do getting there snouts in the trough, compromising themselves and tying themselves to the system. Some are more enthusiastic than others, no one should be so surprised it's in the nature of the system, the real question that faces the general public is not the fate of M.P's or the sacrificing of the speaker who will receive his rewards, he's a member of the privy council for the rest of his life, or some financial reforms to their expenses, all this is odious, but rather what's the nature of the state?, and the system it represents, capitalism?

We need to penetrate beyond the surface of government, to see parliament for what it is - capitalist democracy at work. The state is the product historically of the way in which capitalism rules over society, Parliament is one of the ways they do it, along with the police, courts, prisons, army and secret services and they will use them and have done!, the miners year long struggle against the Thatcher government. Regulating the two opposing irreconcilable forces in society, capitalism and the working class the state is an instrument for the exploitation of the oppressed class, the rule of big business, over the majority of ordinary people. For them democracy is about the right to make a profit, to exploit the resource of the world and all its people, this is absolute, and for them not up for discussion, even if it will lead to ruin, for all of us, now that's real democratic!. If parliament is not fit for purpose then capital will get rid of it, and choose another form of government, so the fact its still here means for the time being it's doing a job?. But for how long!. We need to build our own form of democracy in the interest of the majority of humanity, this is a historical necessity, for the majority of us, nothing less will do!, the trick. It will require the exclusion of capitalism and it's democratic form, from the process, as a relic of the past it can go in to the compost bin of history.

Comments now closed

We do not store your name or email details, but may inform you if someone responds to your comment.

If you want weekly update messages please indicate and we will store your details in a secure database which is not shared with any other organisation.

Your name

Your E-mail
(we will not publish your E-mail)

Do you want Updates?